How Long Is Alprazolam in Your System After Using It — 2019 Update

Alprazolam is more commonly known by its trade name Xanax. It’s currently the most prescribed benzodiazepine in the United States. Last year reported more of 30 000 000 Americans who use it daily. Every fifth of them used it without any prescription.   If you’ve been using Xanax recently, it’s natural to wonder how long Alprazolam is in your system. Can you pass a drug test after a short period of abstinence? Or will you need to take extra precautions? We try to answer both of these questions.

Alprazolam and drug tests: captured or not?

Employers use two basic types of drug tests: standard and extended ones. Standard drug tests are based on federal government guidelines and look for five groups of drugs, namely marijuana, coke, amphetamines (including meth and MDMA), opiates (e.g., heroin, morphine, opium, etc.) and PCP. Extended drug tests, meanwhile, look for much more drugs. There are no legal guidelines what drugs to include in the list, however, so this varies considerably between different labs.
When it comes to Alprazolam, you will generally be okay to take a standard 5-panel drug screen. But, you’ll be at considerable risk of failing an extended one — in 2019 more and more employers use 7 and 10-panel tests. How do you know what kind of tests they are going to use? Better to be ready, moreover, you can be clean in an hour.

How long is Alprazolam remains in your system after stopping?

Alprazolam can stay in your body for a while, or at least its metabolites can. That said, even when you have trace amounts still in your body, you may again pass a drug test because the concentrations are below the detectable threshold. As different drug tests work in different ways, their detection times can vary.

Saliva drug tests for Alprazolam: easy and fast

If you’ve recently stopped taking alprazolam, saliva drug tests are generally the easiest to pass. A 48-hour period of abstinence is usually enough before your test. Or, if your test is in a few hours, use something to help.

Hair drug tests for Xanax: not simple as seems

Even if you’ve been off Alprazolam for some time already, a hair drug test detects “your little secret” with regular usage from the past 90 days. To pass, you would need to be off Alprazolam for about three months before you could safely take a hair drug test.

Urine drug tests: depends on the quantity

Urine drug tests can be a little tricky because much depends on how long you’ve been using Alprazolam. Most short-term users are usually ready for an inspection after four days of abstinence, but it’s not unheard of for chronic users to fail a drug test up to six weeks later.
Considering the differences in people’s metabolisms and the different testing technology, we suggest waiting at least a week before taking the test. Or, if the timeframe is limited, use sub technology. We don’t teach you how to live. But remember that Alprazolam could you to calm, relax, fall asleep and never wake up again. Take care.

24-Hour Pass THC Drug Test Techniques That Help You In 2019

Marijuana-using is a daily routine of one of every six adults in the USA. But the employers have another plan and going to a drug test.

It happens all the time when a urine drug test comes in a few days or even hours.

Body in the sweat. Hands are shaking — mind in panic.

We’ve analyzed the most common reasons for the failure of the THC drug test and make an “easy guide,” and 24-hour pass THC drug test solution exists and still works.

Marijuana user who wants to get a negative drug test result, should:

Don’t let the THC in the body. Even ifyou’ve heard this so many times and can’t count. However, the best way to get a clean sample is avoiding any toxic substance before your test.

Avoid alcohol, nicotine, not needed medications before the test. Better put all these in the trash, if you want to get clean. And don’t forget the prescriptions if taking any drug.

Change eating habits. Just one week on healthy eating helps to clean faster — food overload of saturated fats, fried food, junk food hold on whatever you want to leave. Fiber, vitamins, minerals, “long” carbohydrates, and protein meal will change you.

Put artificial stimulants to the trash. Energetic drinks with a caffeine boost the speed of the metabolic process first. But the second thing then caffeine and sugar leave the system is crushing the metabolic rate, and toxins last for a longer time. Choose another way.

Don’t skip any meal. If you limit yourself to food, the body starts to panic: ” Help! I’m starving! I‘d led with the food!” And the metabolic rate is dropped down. Eat healthily, if you want to pass the test. Period.

Drink water. Sipping it all day long is the best decision, while enough water is the main component of the cleansing process. Take as a rule to drink 6-8 glasses a day.

Exercises raise your detox. Include in your detox plan 30-60 minutes of running, swimming, biking, yoga three times a week until your deadline. Even additional walks with a dog will help. All these help you to burn the fat with THC. But stop extra activity the day before the test.

We understand that you know about all the things listed above — all these “tricks” work, even in 2019. Of course, it seems so dull to eat broccoli with spinach, go to the morning run rather than sit in the cloud of weed smoke among the same fun people.

In conclusion, one more thing, we want to underline. A lot of “weed veterans” prefer household stuff like vinegar, bleach, baking soda, sure jell, eye drops, Aspirin and similar things. Don’t ruin your life trying to cheat the system. If your test in hours,use subbing with clean urine with the same properties as real pee. Do you remember that weed stays in the system for months?

It’s sad, but marijuana for every day recreational using mostly still illegal. Using or not is only your choice.

How Long Does Хanax Stay In Urine: What Change In 2019

Xanax (Alprazolam) still is one of the most popular Benzos in the USA – doctors made almost 50 000 000 prescriptions last year. And how many recreational users take it daily? 

That three things every Xanax user have to know:

#1 The standard drug screen does not detect Xanax in the urine. So, there’s no reason to be anxious.

#2 The extended test for benzodiazepines, can detect the presence of Xanax. Unfortunately, testing labs are increasingly using such type of drug screen.

So, it’s critical to know the answer, how long does Xanax stay in urine.

Xanax helps to feel better in cases of anxiety, panic disorders, sleeplessness, phobia, and a lot of others. In the same time, Xanax rapidly forms the habit, addiction and can cause an overdose. It’s highly abusive, and being suddenly stopped causes withdrawal symptoms.

 2-hour technology to get a clean sample if you have no time to complete detox still works.

When Xanax show up by the urine testing?

Xanax (Alprazolam) like other benzos, is a fast-acting drug. So it flushes from the system rapidly. However, each of us is different. Height, weight, age, level of health, a dose of Xanax, history of use, drug combination. Every detail count.

If you’ve used Xanax or any reason, it stays in urine after the last intake ( updated in 2019)

Low-dose, single using Moderate-dose, occasional using High-dose, regular using
2-4 days 7-10 days 30-40 days

 The cut-off level for Xanax is 400 ng/mL, and if you’re testing positive, the labs have to reconfirm the result using a more accurate GC/MS test. For those, who used Xanax or opiates and going to pass a drug test, a better way to clean from this substance.

How to know, are you’re at risk to be tested?

Random testing is not the best thing in the world. Possibility to be tested is higher or those, who:

  • Look for a job. As Xanax impacts on person’s reaction, a job that requires to be attentive and fast.  Heavy machinery, truck driving, military, work on the assembly still demand to follow their standards and not to use Benzos or similar ones.
  •  
  • Be a professional athlete. Using Xanax recreationally cause serious implications like losing the carrier and future because of positive drug testing.
  •  
  • Go through rehabilitation. If the rehab patient still under the drugs, including prescriptions, the rehab process is complicated.
  •  
  • Be hospitalized. In the hospital, they test all unconscious patients for main toxic substances, including benzodiazepines like Xanax. And if you’re taking prescripted drugs, labs going to control that

What do you’ve to know about Xanax drug testing in 2019?

Step #1 Try abstinence. Sudden stopping of longterm using Xanax causes potentially dangerous withdrawal syndrome. It’s better to be under professional care when you are going to stop Xanax intake.

Step #2 Avoid any drugs and alcohol. It’s the “old trick” to get high, butthe combination with other drugs and alcohol increases the risk many times. Not only for being failed the drug test, its dangerous for life.

Step #3 Stick new lifestyle. Decent food, a lot of drink, enough sleep, light yoga, and self-test to prevent failing still help, even in 2019.

Step #4 Don’t waste time. Use it on the day of the test if you have excessive body mass. In 2 hours, you’ll get a clean sample. Count the time properly.  Take care.

изменения неизбежны

Original on www.ultrasaurus.com

Я в Грейс Хоппер праздновании женщин в области вычислительной техники (заметим, что это не конференция, а празднование!). Существовует сейчас большая группа на Open Source:

* Danese Купер, Sun Microsystems и Open Source Инициатива
* Митчелл Бейкер, главный Lizard Wrangler, Mozilla.org
* Лесли Проктор, Gnome
* Кэти Parlante, OSAF

Было позитивным вдохновляющим для девчонок, который происходит из фона патентованного кодирования и пускается на дивное новое путешествие с открытым исходным кодом с Ласло недавнее объявление . Мне особенно понравился ответ, который Митчелл Бейкер дала на вопрос о том, как индустрия менялась в ответ на инициативы с открытым исходным кодом. Она сказала, что индустрия запоздала с источником перемен и движение с открытым кодом является одним ответом. Мы относительно молодая отрасль, которая продает продукты, которые очень сложны для понимания людей, как использовать и что часто они плохо документированы и иногда несовместимые. Кроме того, люди платят реальные деньги за это программное обеспечение, который поставляется с лицензионным соглашением которое прямо не гарантируют, что продукция будет работать вообще, не говоря уже о совместимости продуктов. Она права. Отрасли программного обеспечения сошли с ума. Может быть, програмное обеспечение с открытым исходным кодом поможет.

Это вдохновляет ее быть среди более чем 800 технических женщин, зная, что это всего лишь небольшая группа женщин в этой области. Я никогда не смогу привыкнуть к ситуации, когда я была единственной женщиной в этой области. Я надеюсь, что мы достигнем цели Аниты 50/50 в 2020 году. Всякий раз, когда это случится, я считаю, изменения неизбежны в этом отношении. Это было удивительно и удивительно слышать, что людей, способствующих проектам с открытым кодом женщины составляют всего 2%. Мне кажется, что проекты с открытым кодом представляет большие возможности для написания кода,приймите в них участие, и измените ситуацию. Danese Купер говорил о пути американских женщин, которые будут создавать шедевры, которые будут переданы на протяжении поколений. Они взяли время, чтобы обработать эти произведения искусства, потому что они были чем-то, что будет жить вне своего времени. Это прекрасная аналогия с открытым исходным кодом. В отличие от проприетарного программного обеспечения, которые часто устаревает через несколько лет, программного обеспечения с открытым исходным кодом является вкладом в большие сообщества и могут жить за пределами нашего личного участия. В дополнение к практической ценности написания исходного кода, которое можно показать потенциальному работодателю и доказать свою кредо без менеджера по найму, как привратника, открытые призывы источника к альтруистическим идеалам и предложениям общественных ценностей, которые традиционно привлекательны для женщин.

 

Clock Widget for WordPress

This is easy widget that displays your analog or digital clock in your sidebar .
Clock widget for wordpress:

  • Display a customizable analog or digital clock.
  • Select your clock title, size, clock type (analog or digital skin),clock body/face flare, clock hour style, clock time property, 4 clock color (body color, face background color, clock face color, second hand color).

Clock screenshot:

Analog clock screenshotDigital Clock 12 hour styled screenshotDigital Clock 24 hour styled screenshot

If you already have widgets installed as part of your WordPress installation, you can try this widget out yourself.
All you need to do to use it:

1. Download the clock.zip file and extract the contents.
2. Make sure you’re running WordPress version 2.8 or better. It won’t work with older versions.
3. Upload the folder to your plugins directory.
4. Activate the “clock” plugin through the ‘plugins’ page in WP.
5. See “clock” widget options to adjust things like display size, clock style and so on. The widget settings take a minute to load to due rendering all the clock on one page.
If you don’t have widgets installed, head off to Automaticc’s Widgets project page and follow their extremely helpful instructions on how to install widgets and add them to your blog template.
It’s all.

You can find lots of useful widgets via the WordPress Widgets blog.

Admin page clock screenshot:
clock Admin page screenshot

10 Myths about Free and Open Source Software

By now, you’d think that anyone who owns a computer knows about free and open source software (FOSS). However, once you move beyond techie circles, you’ll find that, for many people, the concept is unknown. Even worse, when people have heard of it, they have alarming — and rather discouraging — misconceptions of what it involves.

Here are the twelve most common misconceptions of FOSS, and why they’re distorted, exaggerated, outdated, or just plain wrong:

1. If software costs nothing, it’s no good

Technological culture is so influenced by business logic that most of us believe that “you get what you pay for” is common sense. However, when you only look at proprietary software, that adage isn’t true. If price really reflects quality, then Adobe Creative Suite would be six times better than Xara Xtreme.

By the same logic, you can’t judge FOSS by the fact that the price is usually either gratis or nominal to cover shipping. In fact, since FOSS like Bind or Apache is running much of the Internet, you have to conclude that at least some of it is high-quality indeed. But, really, you can’t judge any software in any meaningful way until you’ve tried it.

2. FOSS is inferior to proprietary software

This idea may have had some truth twenty years ago, when FOSS was just getting started, and needed a lot of development to catch up with existing proprietary programs. And you can still find areas today, like OCR scanning, where FOSS is inferior in functionality or usability to its proprietary equivalents.

However, if you compare the most common programs — for instance, Firefox to Internet Explorer, or OpenOffice.org to MS Office — the idea quickly becomes indefensible. While you can quibble over a feature here or there, in general, the leading FOSS programs are a close match for their proprietary equivalents.

3. FOSS is piracy (or at least encourages it)

Actually, since FOSS licenses permit copying and redistribution, the concept of piracy is irrelevant to it. You can’t pirate what the copyright holder encourages you to give away. Moreover, when the few restrictions to copying in FOSS licensing are violated, such as the preservation of the original creator’s credit, many holders of FOSS copyright are prosecuting the violators as fiercely as proprietary software vendors do pirates. For instances, the Busybox project has brought legal action against several violators of its license in the last year.

True, many FOSS supporters would like to see a world where proprietary software doesn’t exist, so you can easily imagine that some might use that ideal as an excuse to ignore proprietary licenses. But since most FOSS supporters either use proprietary software reluctantly or refuse to use it all, such cases are hardly the norm.

4. FOSS has no support

Selling support and related services is how many FOSS-based companies like Red Hat make a profit. But, even if you don’t want to pay for support, most FOSS has mail forums in which you can receive free help — often as quickly as you can from a commercial company. If anything, the problem is not getting help so much as being deluged by suggestions from helpful volunteers.

5. FOSS is only for developers

FOSS has always been centered on developers, who invented it and continue to sustain it. Especially in the early history of FOSS, this orientation meant that little attention was paid to usability. But, as the popularity of FOSS has spread, artists, technical writers, and usability experts have also been attracted to the community. For the last decade now, usability has been an important aspect of FOSS development, and now the leading programs are as easy to use as the leading proprietary ones.

As FOSS continues to spread, the attention to usability can only increase. Recently, for example, Mark Shuttleworth, the leader of the Ubuntu distribution of GNU/Linux, has challenged project members to exceed OS X in usability in the coming years.

6. FOSS is only good for small projects

FOSS developers have inherited the Unix preference for small programs of limited functionality. And it is true that several large FOSS projects, such as OpenOffice.org and Java, were developed privately and later had the code released.

All the same, FOSS has no shortage of large-scale projects, ranging from the GIMP, a PhotoShop equivalent to Scribus, a desktop publishing program, and Inkscape, a vector graphics program. Desktops like Xfce are even larger projects, while GNU/Linux distributions like Ubuntu are larger yet, involving thousands of applications. Such examples make clear that FOSS is perfectly capable of scaling as necessary.

7. Having the code freely available makes it less secure than proprietary code

For those new to security, the idea that the best way to keep something safe is to hide it. This idea is known by experts as security through obscurity, and is generally discredited.

Probably the greatest reason that security through obscurity doesn’t work when it comes to code is that, if security is breached, you have no way of knowing what has happened. By contrast, if the code is open to anyone to read, then the odds are that the insecure elements will be detected and corrected. Since what you want to protect is the information, not the technique used to protect it, according to most security experts, FOSS tends to be more secure than proprietary software.

Of course, because bug detection is public, detractors can say that FOSS is buggier than proprietary software. However, because we have no way of knowing how many bugs in proprietary software go unfixed or unnoticed, the number of reported bugs is not a reliable measure of security.

8. FOSS is unable to innovate

When FOSS got strongly under way in the 1990s, proprietary software had almost two decades’ head start. Under these conditions, for a long time, FOSS development focused on catching up with proprietary software. Also, the standards for usability were developed for proprietary software, so FOSS often seemed to be imitating its rivals, especially since one school of thought held that, to attract users, FOSS needed to resemble as closely as possible what users were familiar with.

Yet, even while the goal was equivalent functionality, FOSS never lacked for innovation. Both the GNOME and KDE desktops, for example, allow a degree of customization unheard of on the Windows desktop, to say nothing of standard features such as virtual desktops. And now, with the release of KDE 4.1, some developers maintain that the FOSS desktop has surpassed proprietary ones, and is now setting the pace for innovation.

Similarly, FOSS has caused a revolution in business, showing that companies can be successful by selling services rather the software itself. You might say that the very idea of FOSS is a major innovation — to say nothing of the communal organization in which FOSS development takes place.

9. Since the license places restrictions on the users, FOSS isn’t really free

The truth is, proprietary licenses restrict users far more than any FOSS license. If you read the typical end-user license agreement closely, you find that you don’t even own the software that you buy. What you have purchased is a license to use, and that license severely limits the number of computers you can install it on and your ability to work with the code.

By contrast, FOSS licenses give you a right to the source code and to use it more or less how you want. Such restrictions as they include, such as preserving copyright notices, fall upon distributors more than users. BSD-style licenses are so permissive that you can even incorporate the code into proprietary code.

Copyleft licenses are more restrictive, in that they insist that, if you distribute the software, you do so without changing the license. However, that restriction simply means that you pass along the same rights that you have in the software to anyone who receives a copy from you. Compared to proprietary licenses’ terms, this is a minor restriction, and justified by the theory that the only way to ensure your own freedom is to ensure everybody’s freedom.

10. FOSS is all about price

The fact that FOSS is often free for the downloading is often what attracts people to it. However, if the lack of cost was a primary motivation for using FOSS, then it would probably be no more popular than shareware.

Those who stay with FOSS usually do so for one of two reasons. For free software supporters, the reason is that they wish to control their computers and what they do with them, rather than allowing a company to exercise that control. For open source supporters, the reason is that freely available source code is an extension of the academic free exchange of ideas, which they believe results in better quality software. In both these cases, it is idealism, not price, that makes FOSS attractive.

Conclusion

Anything said often enough takes on a life of its own. And, because FOSS is relatively unknown and is different from the proprietary norm, it is likely to continue to attract rumors and half-truths. For these reasons, while the myths above are easy to debunk, I don’t imagine that doing so will greatly slow their circulation — nor stop other misconceptions in the future.

Perhaps, though, by answering these myths when you encounter them, you can clear the way for the greatest argument of all — sitting the users of proprietary software down with FOSS to try it for themselves.

Reprinted from: itmanagement.earthweb.com

Browser Battle: Firefox 3.1 vs. Chrome vs. IE 8

Mozilla’s second alpha of Firefox 3.1 is upping the ante in the next-generation browser battle. So how do the main contenders stack up so far now? One thing’s for sure, the Firefox team has taken note of Google’s recent Chrome release and worked hard to make sure its offering can hold its own.

Mozilla had already claimed its 3.1 version could outperform Chrome when it comes to speed (and most independent tests show it at least tying). Now, the engineers have incorporated Chrome-initiated options such as the ability to drag and drop tabs in and out of browser windows. The second alpha release also adds support for the HTML 5 video tag, which gives Web developers expanded options for embedding video within a page. Don’t forget, too, that Microsoft’s new Internet Explorer 8 beta 2 — released at the end of August and quickly eclipsed by Chrome’s introduction — is also vying for a piece of the pie.

Here’s a breakdown of the high and lowlights of each offering and where it stands as far as a full release.

Contender #1: Google Chrome

The status: Windows beta released September 2. Mac OS X and Linux versions still under development and said to be coming soon. No indication of targeted full release date.

The good:

  • Reliability. Chrome’s multiprocess architecture makes a bad Web page less likely to take down the whole browser.
  • Speed. Chrome loads fast and keeps your surfing super-fast.
  • Simplicity. Its clean design wastes no screen space.
  • Searching. The Omnibox lets you type search terms or URLs into a single spot and figures out what you want.
  • Privacy. Chrome offers an "Incognito" mode that lets you easily leave no footprints from where you’ve been.

The bad:

  • Privacy. Chrome’s taken a lot of heat for its monitoring and collection of user data, some of which happens before you even hit enter.
  • Security. It didn’t take long for users to discover vulnerabilities in the beta browser. Several of these have already been patched.
  • Reliability. Some sites and online services still don’t work with Chrome.
  • Consistency. Because Chrome is build on the WebKit system, it differs from the dominant platforms that most designers focus on.
  • Support. Chrome doesn’t yet have any add-ons or customization options available. It’s yet to be seen how these, once developed, will compare to the rich options available for Firefox.

Contender #2: Firefox 3.1

The status: Second alpha build released September 5. Beta expected in the next month. Full release targeted for end of 2008.

The good:

  • Strong foundation. Mozilla’s already built a loyal following with Firefox, and it doesn’t intend on letting that go. With Firefox 3.1, you know you’ll have a powerful library of add-ons and support already at your fingertips, not to mention the slew of other assets unveiled in Firefox 3.0.
  • Speed. Mozilla says its still-under-development TraceMonkey JavaScript platform will leave Google’s V8 in the dust. The second alpha build revs things up, too, with added support for "Web workers" — a system that lets multiple scripts run as background processes.
  • Competitive edge. Mozilla’s developers have good reason to watch what Chrome is doing — and work to match it, if not one-up it.

The bad:

  • Security questions. Some studies — albeit, Microsoft-funded ones — have suggested Firefox, with its frequent new versions, is more susceptible to threats than the other options.
  • Crash potential. Unlike Chrome, Firefox does not have separate environments for each tab — so one rogue page can still take the whole program down.
  • Support. Firefox has worked hard to snag a small portion of the browser market share, and most early predictions show Chrome taking away more of its userbase than IE’s.
  • Google’s focus on Chrome will also take away some of its previous focus on Mozilla’s development efforts. Will Firefox be able to remain a key player in the browser war?

Contender #3: Internet Explorer 8

The status:: Second beta released August 27. Full release expected before the end of 2008.

The good:

  • Support. Love it or hate it, Internet Explorer is hanging on to about three-quarters of the browsing market with its default status in all Windows machines. You know developers and designers are going to cater to it.
  • Security. With Microsoft at its helm, IE hangs on to a reputation of safe and reliable browsing.
  • Privacy. IE 8 was the first to offer a no-record browsing mode, branded here as InPrivate Browsing.
  • Searching. IE 8’s Smart Address Bar offers similar functionality to Chrome’s Omnibox, letting you type in URLs or search terms and taking you to the right place.
  • Added add-ons. IE 8 finally catches up to Firefox with a new "Gallery" full of third-party add-on options..

    The bad:

  • Speed. Independent tests have found IE 8 to be significantly slower than the alternative choices. Resources. IE 8 uses a lot of memory compared to its competitors — a factor that could considerably slow down the rest of your system.
  • Crash potential. While IE 8 does use separate processes for tabs, similar to Chrome’s approach, it does not do so to the same degree
  • — still leaving room for a total meltdown.
  • Competition questions. Can IE’s add-ons reach the level of Firefox’s? Already, some users are complaining of problems even getting them to work.

That’s the lowdown on the battle’s current status. Remember, all three of these programs are still early in their development, so many of the pluses and minuses could change as things move forward. One thing’s for sure, though: This battle is on, it’s growing fierce, and each of its contenders will do anything it can to win.

Reprinted from: Browser Battle: Firefox 3.1 vs. Chrome vs. IE 8

WordPress xmlPad Plugin

What’s this? XMLPAD plugin for wordpress syndicate PAD file in wordpress.
REQUIREMENTS

To run xmlPad you will need WordPress 2 or greater and PHP 4.3.0 or greater.

INSTALLATION

You can download it here (xmlpad).
The installation process is very simple and no special steps are needed.
Drop the “xmlpad” directory into the “plugins” directory in WordPress.

The “xmlpad” directory should now contain the files “xmlpad.php”, “reader.php”,
“config.php”, “template.php”, “readme.txt” and the “cache” directory. The cache
directory must be writeable by web server user. If you are new to linux these
commands will help you to give proper permissions to cache directory:

cd xmlpad/directory
chmod 755 cache
chmod 755 cache/img

In the “Plugins” section of “Site Admin”, click “Activate” adjacent to
“xmlPad”. Everything is done! Now you can use your xmlPad plugin for WordPress.
USAGE

Insert “[xmlpad:URL]” into the post and replace “URL” with the URL of the
XMLPAD file location. Choose “Save” and look at your post. The first time
it loads the xmlPad plugin will try to get information from remote file
and cache it in the local directory. The images used by xmlpad file will
also be cached.

CONFIGURATION

You can find the most common setting in the config.php file. Let’s look
at it a bit closer:

$config[‘cache_lifetime’] – the number of seconds the cache is valid

$config[‘encoding’] – you can change the output encoding of xmlpad plugin
to that your blog uses

$config[‘dateformat’] – there are a lot of date fields in xmlpad file and
you can set your own date format

$config[‘relurls’] – should we use absolute or relative paths for cached images.
The default value is false.

The most interesting settings are located in $config[‘fields’] variables. The
second key in this associative array is the name of xmlpad field caption and
value is the path to element in remote xmlpad file. For example the line

$config[‘fields’][‘Program name’] = ‘program_info/program_name’;

tells plugin to read data from “program_info/program_name” xml node and give it
“Program name” caption in the output. You can also add separators to the output
by adding special record to configuration file. Here it is:

$config[‘fields’][] = ‘sep’;

Try to experiment with configuration file and you will be able to fully customize
the plugin output.

If you need to change the appearance of xmlpad output you can take a look at
template.php file. It’s responsible for output formating. This file is very
small and it’s easy to understand the logic behind it. Just plain php, nothing
more.

NOTES

The cache time is set to 24 hours by default, so changes to the remote xmlpad file
may not show up immediately. You can set cache time to whatever you want in the
configuration file as described above. To clarify the cache you need to remove all
files from “cache” except “img” directory.

If you want to change the output encoding you’ll need iconv php extension to be
installed.
Example for http://www.simplysup.com/padfiles/trpad.xml :

   

[xmlpad:http://www.simplysup.com/padfiles/trpad.xml]